Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View Records Sponsored partner optionCalifornia criminal-record research begins with a scope decision: a person reviewing their own DOJ criminal-history summary uses a fingerprint-based state process, while public case research goes to the Superior Court where the case was filed.
Use DOJ for your own state summary and county Superior Courts for public case records. Do not represent one product as the other.
For California criminal records online, do not look for one public statewide name-search database. Use California DOJ when reviewing your own fingerprint-based state summary criminal history, and use the relevant county Superior Court for public case information or certified court documents. The two record systems have different access rules and should remain separate.
| Need | Custodian | Access pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Your own statewide summary history | California DOJ | Fingerprint-based personal record review. |
| A public criminal court case | County Superior Court | Case search or clerk access based on the filing court. |
| Certified court document | Filing Superior Court | Copy/certification request to the court custodian. |
| Field | Court use | DOJ/self-history use |
|---|---|---|
| Case number | Best direct locator for a known case | Can help reconcile a reported disposition. |
| County/court | Required custodian context | Explains which court submitted case information. |
| Date of birth | May assist permitted identity matching | Part of identity verification. |
| Fingerprint identity | Not the ordinary court search key | Core to the personal DOJ record-review route. |
The DOJ summary is built from information submitted by criminal-justice agencies and courts, while a Superior Court file preserves the procedural record for one case. If the question is “what is on my statewide criminal history,” use the DOJ review. If the question is “what happened in this case,” use the filing court.
When a summary and court record appear inconsistent, preserve both source dates and the case identifier. Corrections often require the underlying court or agency information, so retaining provenance is more useful than copying a third-party profile.